Exploration of Vice Chancellors’ Perceptions on Institutional Barriers to Undergraduate Access in Nigeria’s Private Universities: A Mixed Methods Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64074/jorma006Keywords:
Undergraduate Access , Private Universities , Institutional Barriers, Higher Education Access , NigeriaAbstract
This mixed methods case study explored vice chancellors’ perceptions on institutional barriers to undergraduate access in Nigeria’s private universities. Three research questions were developed through a reflexive approach, guided by the framework. Using purposive sampling, 6 vice chancellors out of 29 were selected from across the six geopolitical zones, representing a 21% response rate. The study employed a convergent parallel research design, conducting one-on-one semi-structured interviews for qualitative data, which was thematically analysed. Quantitative measures extracted archival secondary data from policy documents produced by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) between 2015 and 2023 on annual key figures, including candidates’ applications, the number of candidates examined, enrolment figures across all universities, and quota allocations. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to identify trends and disparities in enrolment, particularly in private universities. Analyses of findings and results suggest that institutional barriers are significant obstacles created by regulatory institutions and internal university policies, collectively limiting the accessibility and attractiveness of private universities in Nigeria. The centralised system of JAMB continues to create challenges for students, universities, and the broader educational landscape, ultimately contributing to low enrolment in private universities. Significant annual disparities also exist between registered candidates for the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examinations (UTME), examination takers, and enrolees in private universities. The government's comprehensive policy approach continues to restrict universities’ autonomy, limiting their ability to adapt curricula to local needs. The study made recommendations for policy and practice, based on the findings.
References
Akuta, Chinedu Vincent (2009). Abolish Quota System or Quota System will abolish Nigeria. Retrieved 18/05/2025. https://www.inigerian.com/abolish-quota-system-or-quota-system-will-abolish-nigeria/
Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M. (2019). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Chang, S. J., & Wu, B. (2014). Institutional barriers and industry dynamics. Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1103-1123.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Giardina, M. D., & Cannella, G. S. (Eds.). (2023). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage publications.
Guetterman, T. C., & Fetters, M. D. (2018). Two methodological approaches to the integration of mixed methods and case study designs: A systematic review. American Behavioural Scientist, 62(7), 900-918.
Hatch, J. A. (2023). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State university of New York Press.
Jackson-Gordon, R., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2024). Using a joint display for building integration in a sequential study: Informing data collection for a participatory second phase. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(2), 137-146.
Kanyip, B. P. (2013). Admission crisis in Nigerian universities: The challenges youth and parents face in seeking admission.
Krücken, G. (2003). Mission impossible? Institutional barriers to the diffusion of the" third academic mission" at German universities. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(1-2), 18-33.
Lebeau, Y., & Oanda, I. O. (2020). Higher education expansion and social inequalities in Sub-Saharan Africa: Conceptual and empirical perspectives (No. 2020-10). UNRISD Working Paper.
Mertler, C. A. (2021). Introduction to educational research. Sage Publications.
Milanovic, B. (2003). Is inequality in Africa really different? Available at SSRN 636588.
Moti, U. G. (2012). Development plans and visions as a strategy for sustainable development: the experience of Nigeria. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 4(1), 50-96.
Okebukola, P. (2010, September). Fifty years of higher education in Nigeria: Trends in quality assurance. Paper presented at the 50th Independence Anniversary Conference, New York.
Olawore, O. P., & Ajayi, T. B. (2016). The emergence of private universities in Nigeria and their various challenges. Journal of Applied Information Science and Technology, 9(1), 31-38.
Sawyerr, A. (2004). Challenges facing African universities: Selected issues. African studies review, 159.
Shelton, J. M. (2021). Situational, institutional, dispositional barriers faced by nontraditional students in their access and pursuit of higher education. Trident University International.
Shimeles, A., & Nabassaga, T. (2018). Why is inequality high in Africa? Journal of African Economies, 27(1), 108-126.
Statista Research Department (2023). Number of undergraduate students at universities in Nigeria as of 2019, by ownership. Accessed 01/11/2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1262912/number-of-bachelor-students-at-universities-in-nigeria-by-ownership/.
Sugiyono, S. (2021). The evaluation of facilities and infrastructure standards achievement of vocational high school in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 25(2), 207-217.
Varghese, N. V. (2004). Private higher education in Africa. International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP). UNESCO, Geneva.
Wilkins, S. (2016). Establishing international branch campuses: A framework for assessing opportunities and risks. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(2), 167-182.
Wilson-Strydom, M. (2015). University access and theories of social justice: contributions of the capabilities approach. Higher Education 69, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9766-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.