Epistemic Violence in Psychological Research: Unveiling Bias in Methodology, Methods, and the Peer Review Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64074/qwtkrn56Keywords:
Epistemic violence, Methodological bias, Decolonial StudiesAbstract
The concept of epistemic violence, which defines the oppression of knowledge systems and knowers, has become more significant when applied to psychological research. The article interrogates epistemic violence through the examination of research design, as well as methodological paradigms and methods, and the peer review process. This paper examines how mainstream psychological science creates epistemic exclusion by favouring Western positivist approaches over indigenous experiential and non-normative ways of knowing through the lens of postcolonial theory, feminist epistemology, and critical psychology. The methodological gatekeeping together with disciplinary conventions and reviewer biases operate as mechanisms that lead to epistemic marginalisation of research produced by scholars from historically excluded communities. The article suggests strategies for improving research inclusivity and epistemic justice in academic culture, including methodological pluralism, reflexive research approaches, and changes to peer review procedures. The analysis aims to advance existing efforts for psychological knowledge decolonisation and academic publishing equity enhancement.
References
Adams, G., Dobles, I., Gómes, L. H., Kurtis, T., & Molina, L. E. (2015). Decolonising psychological science: Introduction to the special thematic section. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.564
Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalisation of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598908247841
Bhakuni, H., & Abimbola, S. (2021). Epistemic injustice in academic global health. The Lancet Global Health, 9(10), e1465–e1470.
Bhatia, S. (2018). Decolonising psychology: Globalisation, social justice, and Indian youth identities. Oxford University Press.
Dansiger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press.
Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.
Fine, M. (2012). Disruptive psychological science: Narrative as a method in psychology. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), 1–8.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Gergen, K. J. (2001). Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist, 56(10), 803–813.
Hirschauer, S. (2010). Editorial judgments: A practice theoretical perspective on peer review. Social Studies of Science, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709335405
Kessi, S., & Boonasier, F. (2018). Centre/ing decolonial feminist psychology in Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 48, 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246318784507
Kurtis¸, T., & Adams, G. E. (2015). Decolonising liberation: Toward a transnational feminist psychology. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 388–413. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.326
Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). Who's asking? Native science, Western science, and science education. MIT Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
Ncube, M. (2024) Decolonial Psychology in P. Matthijs Bal, Elgar Encyclopedia of Organizational Psychology. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar publishing Ltd.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2023). On epistemic freedom and epistemic injustice. London: Routledge.
Reddy, G , Ratele, K, Adams, G and Suffla, S, 2021. Decolonising psychology: moving from developing an inclusive social psychology to centring epistemic justice. Social Psychological Review, 23 (2), pp. 10-12.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Teo, T. (2018). What is epistemological violence in the empirical social sciences? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00265.x
Yasan, B. and Keleş, U. (2025) Can the subaltern speak in autoethnography?: knowledging through dialogic and retro/intro/pro-spective reflection to stand against epistemic violence" Applied Linguistics Review, 16, 1, pp. 243-264. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0010
